Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) Reports Sales Below Analyst Estimates In Q1 Earnings
April 22, 2025
Electric vehicle pioneer Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) fell short of the market’s revenue expectations in Q1 CY2025, with sales falling 9.2% year on year to $19.34 billion. Its GAAP profit of $0.12 per share was 58.4% below analysts’ consensus estimates.
The vast majority of Tesla’s revenue (76.9%) comes from electric vehicle (EV) sales, making metrics like units delivered and average sale price crucial for our analysis. However, two emerging questions are shifting the conversation beyond just car sales.
Can the Services segment - mainly consisting of low-margin maintenance and repairs today - decouple from vehicle sales with Tesla’s new AI-driven products?
Sparking hope for bulls are new technologies like Full Self-Driving (FSD) and a potential robotaxi fleet. If successfully commercialized, they could not only supercharge top-line growth but also lift Services gross margin from the high-single-digit percentages.
The second question is whether Tesla’s Energy Generation and Storage division could approach the value of its automotive business. While this may seem farfetched since Energy contributed just 11.7% of revenue last year, a case can be made.
GenAI applications could be the catalyst that accelerates this business as they require vast amounts of computational power. Furthermore, as energy disruptions from extreme weather become more frequent, Tesla’s products could emerge as critical infrastructure.
One standout product we’re closely watching in the Energy segment is the Megapack, a large-scale battery system that stores and distributes massive amounts of electricity. Each Megapack can power 100 to 150 homes for 24 hours and sells for over $1 million. Megapacks also have higher margins than EVs - in fact, a single Megapack sale generates as much operating profit as around 100 Tesla automobiles.
If Tesla can scale its Energy business and expand its software Services offerings, the growth potential is enormous and could settle the debate once and for all.
Revenue Growth
Tesla proves that huge, scaled companies can still grow quickly. The company’s revenue base of $26.02 billion five years ago has more than tripled to $95.72 billion in the last year, translating into an incredible 29.8% annualized growth rate.
Over the same period, Tesla’s automotive peers Rivian, General Motors, and Ford put up annualized growth rates of 262%, 6.4%, and 3.5%, respectively. Just note that while Rivian has the most similar vehicles to Tesla, comparisons aren’t exactly apples-to-apples because it’s growing from a much smaller revenue base and selling its EVs at a loss.
We at StockStory emphasize long-term growth, but for disruptive companies like Tesla, a half-decade historical view may miss emerging trends in autonomous vehicles and energy. Tesla’s recent performance shows its demand has slowed significantly as its annualized revenue growth of 5.5% over the last two years was well below its five-year trend.
This quarter, Tesla missed Wall Street’s estimates and reported a rather uninspiring 9.2% year-on-year revenue decline, generating $19.34 billion of revenue. Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 12.8% over the next 12 months, an improvement versus the last two years. This projection is admirable for a company of its scale and illustrates the market is baking in success for its newer products.
Today’s young investors likely haven’t read the timeless lessons in Gorilla Game: Picking Winners In High Technology because it was written more than 20 years ago when Microsoft and Apple were first establishing their supremacy. But if we apply the same principles, then enterprise software stocks leveraging their own generative AI capabilities may well be the Gorillas of the future. So, in that spirit, we are excited to present our Special Free Report on
a profitable, fast-growing enterprise software stock that is already riding the automation wave and looking to catch the generative AI next
.
Automotive: Act One
Revenue: The Race For Dominance
Tesla is primarily an automobile manufacturer today and generates 76.9% of its revenue through the sale and leasing of EVs. It historically produced expensive, high-end EVs, but after years of operating losses, has shifted its focus to the mass market with affordable vehicles. The Model 3 and Model Y (released in 2017 and 2019) are the headliners of this story, and we’ll dive into their impacts below.
Over the last five years, Tesla’s vehicles sold grew by 34.6% annually to 1.74 million units in the last year. This is meaningfully above the its 27.1% annualized growth rate for Automotive revenue, implying that its average vehicle price fell.
Specifically, Tesla's average revenue per vehicle sold was $42,355 for the trailing 12 months, noticeably lower than the $56,544 price tag in 2020.
These unit and pricing trends uncover three facets of the company’s automotive business:
1) It has achieved its goal of selling more Model 3 and Model Y vehicles, which carry lower price tags than other models, 2) the scaling production of its mass-market models is boosting manufacturing efficiency because it lowers the fixed cost per vehicle sold, and 3) rather than increasing profitability by reaping the cost-saving benefits, Tesla is passing them to customers through price reductions.
In Q1, Tesla’s vehicles sold shrank by 13% year on year to 336,681 units and missed Wall Street’s expectations. Putting this print side-by-side with its 19.6% Automotive revenue decline suggests an average vehicle price of $41,484, down from $44,926 in the same quarter last year.
Unit Economics: The Impact Of Price Cuts
There’s no denying automobile manufacturing is a tough business. Few upstarts succeed because incumbents like General Motors and Ford can afford to break even on the initial sale of vehicles and instead make money on parts and servicing, which come many years down the line. This is why new entrants such as Rivian have negative gross margins - they must price competitively, and their fleets are too young to generate substantial aftermarket revenues.
Tesla does not disclose the operating profitability of its segments, but we can analyze the gross margins of its various divisions to see how it stacks up. For Automotive, this metric reflects how much revenue is left after paying for the raw materials, components, and direct labor costs that go into manufacturing and producing its vehicles.
Thankfully for investors, Tesla has crossed the chasm as its Automotive segment boasted an average gross margin of 23.2% over the last five years. While it may be low in absolute terms, Tesla’s margin was best in class for the industry and illustrates its superior pricing power and procurement capabilities. Its breathing room also explains why the company can squeeze its competitors by slashing prices.
Looking under the hood, Automotive’s annual gross margin fell from 22.4% five years ago to 18.7% in the last year. This is a direct result of its price cuts and shows the company is sacrificing higher profits today to increase its installed base and potentially secure longer-term recurring revenue streams. Its gross margin ticked lower this quarter to 16.2%.
Key Takeaways from Tesla’s Q1 Results
We struggled to find many positives in these results as Tesla delivered fewer vehicles than forecasted, its revenue in all three segments (Services, Automotive, and Energy) missed, and its EPS fell short of Wall Street’s estimates. Overall, this was a softer quarter. The stock remained flat at $238.01 immediately following the results, likely because expectations were already so low going into the print.
The latest quarter from Tesla’s wasn’t that good. One earnings report doesn’t define a company’s quality, though, so let’s explore whether the stock is a buy at the current price. When making that decision, it’s important to consider its valuation, business qualities, as well as what has happened in the latest quarter.
We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it’s free
.