Clouds Part Over Apple’s Stock—for Now

Apple just dodged a large bullet. There will be more.

Late Friday news broke of an exemption for smartphones , laptop computers and other electronics imported from China, sparing Apple from the bulk of drastic tariffs set by President Trump. Those tariffs— announced on April 2 and ratcheted up the following week—would have substantially increased Apple’s costs and either crimped its vital profit margins or required price increases for customers already paying $1,000 or more for the latest iPhones.

Most Read from The Wall Street Journal

Both were unappealing prospects—especially during a year when Apple is already struggling to sell its latest iPhones and launch new generative artificial-intelligence services for its devices. Shares in the world’s most valuable company have been hammered .

Even after a market bounceback following Trump’s clawback of some tariffs, Apple’s stock ended last week down nearly 12% from where it was before the initial tariff announcement. The other five megacap tech names averaged a loss of only 2%.

Apple shares jumped more than 4% Monday morning following the latest exemptions. Even so, investors shouldn’t assume it’s back to business as usual.

That became clear even before the weekend was over, after Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Sunday that more tariffs could soon be coming on electronic products. Trump himself said in a social media post later Sunday that “NOBODY is getting ‘off the hook’” on tariffs. The continued uncertainty will hang over Apple’s stock, raising the question of whether it can—or even should—reclaim its previous, rich valuation.

Going forward, Apple’s multiple will need to reflect a Trump discount. This will have to take into account the incredible leverage the administration now has over the company and chief Tim Cook.

Every administration utterance from this point on will have the potential to rekindle the existential crisis that gripped Apple the past two weeks.

And this is an administration that remains keenly interested in on-shoring production of everything designed by U.S. companies. Trying to do that at Apple would effectively set back the clock by 20 years—the company’s annual statement filed in 2005 was the first to claim that final assembly of “substantially all” of the products it sold took place in China.

OK